Crystalline forms of a macrolide, and uses therefor

ABSTRACT

New crystalline forms of macrolide compounds, and pharmaceutical compositions thereof, are described herein. In addition, processes for preparing the crystalline forms are described herein.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/636,510, filed Sep. 21, 2012, which is a U.S. national counterpart application of international application serial no. PCT/US2011/29424 filed Mar. 22, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/316,063, filed Mar. 22, 2010, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention described herein relates to a macrolide compound. More particularly, it relates to new crystalline forms of the macrolide compound, to processes for the preparation of the crystalline forms, and to pharmaceutical compositions containing the forms.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is appreciated that compounds considered as candidates for further development as pharmaceuticals advantageously possess desirable biological properties, but also physical properties that adapt them for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. For example, compounds that form stable solids, including crystalline solids may be more readily manufactured and formulated. It is further appreciated that individual physical forms of the compound that are stable and additionally that may be prepared substantially free of other physical forms may also be more readily manufactured and formulated. It is to be understood herein that different physical forms may have markedly different physical properties, such as different solubility characteristics, different bioavailabilities and/or biological exposure, different stability, and the like.

In US patent application publication number US 2006/0100164, there are disclosed certain macrolide antibiotic compounds. The foregoing publication, and each additional publication cited herein is incorporated herein by reference. One of these macrolides is a fluoroketolide having Chemical Abstracts Registry Number 760981-83-7, which is also known as CEM-101 and solithromycin. The preparation of an amorphous form of CEM-101 is described therein. An alternative preparation of CEM-101 is described in WO 2009/055557. CEM-101 has the following chemical structure:

It has been discovered herein that CEM-101 can be isolated in a variety of crystalline forms which provide illustrative embodiments of the invention. CEM-101 can be isolated in crystalline form as a material having a range of different physical properties, depending upon the method of isolation. This is because CEM-101 can exist in more than one crystalline form, i.e., it exhibits polymorphism. CEM-101 can be isolated in at least two crystalline forms, denoted herein as Form I and Form II, each of which is pure or substantially pure and/or free of or substantially free of the other form. Various mixtures of Form I and Form II can also be isolated. In addition, solids which are mixtures of one ore more crystalline materials and also include amorphous solids can be obtained.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Illustrative examples of X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) spectra for each of Form I and Form II are given in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, respectively, showing degrees 20 on the X-axis and relative intensity on the Y-axis.

More detailed listings of the peaks for each of Form I and Form II are provided below in Tables 1-4 in the Examples, in which peaks are denoted as % relative intensity (I/I₀×100). It is to be understood that in the X-ray powder diffraction spectra the exact values measured for °2θ (or the corresponding d-spacings) may vary depending upon the particular sample analyzed and the particular analysis procedure used. A range of values of at least ±0.1 °2θ, and in some cases at least ±0.2 °2θ, may be typical. Measurements on independently prepared samples on different instruments may lead to variability which is greater than ±0.1 °2θ and/or ±0.2 °2θ.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The new physical form, Form I of CEM-101 is a crystalline form which may be described by its X-ray powder diffraction pattern. Peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=8.8, 10.5, 13.2 and 18.6 are representative of this crystalline form. An example of an X-ray powder diffraction spectrum for Form I is shown in FIG. 1. A more detailed analysis of the peaks is described in Tables 1-2 below. Form I of CEM-101 demonstrates minimal weight loss by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Water determination by Karl Fisher titration in typical lots is 0.6 to 1.1%. Dynamic vapor sorption indicates that the material is partially hygroscopic, but Form I solids are isolated upon desorption. Form I of CEM-101 melts at about 200° C. by DSC analysis.

As one embodiment there is described Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=8.8, 10.5, 13.2 and 18.6. As another embodiment there is described a solid form of CEM-101 comprising Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=8.8, 10.5, 13.2 and 18.6. As another embodiment there is described a composition comprising CEM-101, where the majority of CEM-101 is Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=8.8, 10.5, 13.2 and 18.6. As another embodiment there is described CEM-101 in each of the foregoing embodiments having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern substantially the same as that of FIG. 1.

The new physical form, Form I, is physically stable and can be prepared substantially free of other physical forms, as described below. In one embodiment, there is described Form I of CEM-101 that is substantially free of Form II. The relative amounts of forms may be determined by a variety of analytical techniques, for example but not limited to, by the presence or absence of representative peaks, and/or by the relative peak heights and/or peak areas of appropriate discernable peaks in the XRPD spectrum. Form I of CEM-101, substantially free of other physical forms, may be characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=8.8, 10.5, 13.2 and 18.6. Peaks at about °2θ=6.2, 19.7 and/or 21.9 are also observed for this crystalline form. In another embodiment, there is described Form I of CEM-101 in each of the foregoing embodiments that is characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=8.8, 10.5, 13.2 and 18.6, and one or more additional peaks at about °2θ=6.2, 19.7 and/or 21.9. In another embodiment, there is described Form I of CEM-101 in each of the foregoing embodiments that is substantially free of Form II as determined by the X-ray powder diffraction pattern, wherein one or more peaks at °2θ=5.6, 9.8, and/or 11.7 are absent or nearly absent.

In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the composition comprises or consists essentially of Form I of CEM-101, as described in each of the foregoing embodiments. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the composition comprises CEM-101, where the CEM-101 is at least about 60%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99% Form I. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the composition comprises CEM-101, where the CEM-101 is substantially free of Form II. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include Form I of CEM-101 are described, where the relative amount of Form II is less than about 40%, 20%, 10%, 5%, 2% or 1%. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the relative amount of Form I and Form II is determined by the relative peak heights of specific peaks. Illustrative relative peak height ratios for the peaks at °2θ=6.2 and °2θ=5.6 are a ratio of about 5:1 or more, about 10:1 or more, or about 20:1 or more. As another embodiment there is described Form I of CEM-101, substantially free of other physical forms. As another embodiment there is described a pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern substantially the same as that of FIG. 1.

The new physical form, Form II of CEM-101 is a crystalline form which may be described by its X-ray powder diffraction pattern. Peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.3, 11.7, 12.9 and 16.7 are representative of this crystalline form. An example of an X-ray powder diffraction spectrum for Form II is shown in FIG. 2. A more detailed analysis of the peaks is described in Tables 3-4 below. Based on a single crystal X-ray determination and dynamic vapor sorption analysis, Form II appears to be a non-hygroscopic anhydrous crystalline form that melts at about 225° C. as a single endothermic event by DSC analysis. It is appreciated herein that non-hygroscopic solids, such as Form II described herein, may be advantageous in the preparation of pharmaceutical compositions. Such advantages include improved handling and stability properties in manufacturing, improved lot to lot quality control.

As one embodiment there is described Form II of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.3, 11.7, 12.9 and 16.7. As another embodiment there is described a solid form of CEM-101, comprising Form II of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.3, 11.7, 12.9 and 16.7. As another embodiment there is described a composition comprising CEM-101, where the majority of CEM-101 is Form II of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.3, 11.7, 12.9 and 16.7. As another embodiment there is described CEM-101 in each of the foregoing embodiments having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern substantially the same as that of FIG. 2.

The new physical form, Form II, is physically stable and can be prepared substantially free of other physical forms, as described below. In one embodiment, there is described Form II of CEM-101 that is substantially free of Form I. The relative amounts of forms may be determined by a variety of analytical techniques, for example but not limited to, by the presence or absence of representative peaks, and/or by the relative peak heights and/or peak areas of appropriate discernable peaks in the XRPD spectrum. Form II of CEM-101, substantially free of other physical forms, may be characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.3, 11.7, 12.9 and 16.7. In another embodiment, there is described Form II of CEM-101 in each of the foregoing embodiments that is substantially free of Form I as determined by the X-ray powder diffraction pattern, wherein one or more peaks at °2θ=6.2 and/or 8.8 are absent or nearly absent.

In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the composition comprises or consists essentially of Form II of CEM-101, as described in each of the foregoing embodiments. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the composition comprises CEM-101, where the CEM-101 is at least about 60%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, or at least about 99% Form II. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include Form II of CEM-101 are described, where the relative amount of Form I is less than about 40%, 20%, 10%, 5%, 2% or 1%. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the composition comprises CEM-101, where the CEM-101 is substantially free of Form I. In another embodiment, pharmaceutical compositions that include CEM-101 are described, where the relative amount of Form II and Form I is determined by the relative peak heights of specific peaks. Illustrative relative peak height ratios for the peaks at °2θ=5.6 and °2θ=6.2 are a ratio of about 5:1 or more, about 10:1 or more, or about 20:1 or more. As another embodiment there is described Form II of CEM-101, substantially free of other physical forms. Form II of CEM-101, substantially free of other physical forms, may be characterized by an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.3, 11.7, 12.9 and 16.7. As another embodiment there is described a pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern substantially the same as that of FIG. 2.

As a further embodiment there is described a pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 in any ratio of Form I and Form II. As a further embodiment there is described a pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 in any ratio of Form I and amorphous CEM-101. As a further embodiment there is described a pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 in any ratio of Form II and amorphous CEM-101. As a further embodiment there is described a pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 in any ratio of Form I and Form II and amorphous CEM-101.

Form I of CEM-101, including Form I substantially free of other physical forms, may be prepared by recrystallization as described below in the Examples, for example by a recrystallization procedure as described in Table A., Experiments 18, 21-23 and 26. In the table, the ratios of solvent to CEM-101 are given in a volume:weight ratio (mL/mg or L/g) where “T” indicates “times” of volume. In general, Form I may be obtained by adding a solution of CEM-101 in a water miscible, polar organic solvent, such as for example acetone, methanol or ethanol, to water to afford Form I of CEM-101.

According to one embodiment, described herein is a process for the preparation of Form I of CEM-101. The process includes the step of adding a solution of CEM-101 in a water miscible, polar organic solvent to water, such as at a temperature below 50° C. In addition, the process may include one or more of the following additional steps: heating the solution of CEM-101, filtering the solution of CEM-101, reducing the volume of the solution of CEM-101 by evaporation, stirring the water during the addition of the solution of CEM-101. In another embodiment, the prepared Form I of CEM-101 is substantially free of other physical forms. In another embodiment, the prepared Form I of CEM-101 is substantially free of Form II.

According to another embodiment, described herein is a process for the preparation of Form I of CEM-101, which comprises one or more of the steps of dissolving a source of CEM-101 in acetone, methanol or ethanol, or a combination thereof, optionally above ambient temperature, optionally filtering the solution, reducing the volume of the resultant solution by evaporation, adding the solution to water at a temperature below 50° C., optionally with stirring, and collecting the resulting crystalline solid. A further embodiment is one wherein the above solvent is acetone. A further embodiment is one wherein the above solvent is ethanol.

For any of the above processes a further embodiment is one wherein the solution is added to water at a temperature of about 10° C. to about 30° C. Another embodiment is one wherein the solution is added to water dropwise. In another embodiment the prepared Form I of CEM-101 is substantially free of other physical forms. In another embodiment the prepared Form I of CEM-101 is substantially free of Form II.

For any of the above processes for the preparation of Form I of CEM-101, any of the solvents acetone, methanol or ethanol, or a combination thereof may be used. In another embodiment, the organic solution is slowly added to water at about 20-30° C. In another embodiment, the volume:volume ratio of the organic solution to water is about 6 to about 15.

In another embodiment, the volume:volume ratio of the organic solution to water is about 10 to about 13.

The above processes may be carried out with or without using seeds of Form I of CEM-101.

Form II of CEM-101, including Form II substantially free of other physical forms, may be prepared as described below in the Examples, for example by recrystallization as described in Table A., Experiments 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19 and 24, or by a slurry procedure as illustrated in Table B. In general, Form II may be obtained by adding water to a solution of CEM-101 in a water miscible, polar organic solvent. In addition, Form II of CEM-101 may be obtained by recrystallization from a number of organic solvents, with and without use of an antisolvent, and with or without use of seeding, as shown in Table A. Alternatively, a mixture of Form I and Form II may be converted into Form II of CEM-101 by slurrying the mixture in, for example, 2-propanol (isopropyl alcohol, IPA) at 60° C., or by slurrying the mixture in 2-butanone (methyl ethyl ketone, MEK) under a variety of conditions.

According to one embodiment, described herein is a process for the preparation of Form II of CEM-101. The process includes the step of adding water to a solution of CEM-101 in a water miscible, polar organic solvent. In addition, the process may include one or more of the following additional steps: filtering the solution of CEM-101, reducing the volume of the solution of CEM-101 by evaporation, stirring the solution of CEM-101 during addition of the water, and collecting the resulting crystalline solid. In another embodiment, the water miscible, polar organic solvent is protic. In another embodiment, the water miscible, polar organic solvent is aprotic. A further embodiment is one wherein the water miscible, polar organic solvent is acetone, acetonitrile, 1,4-dioxane, methanol or ethanol, or a combination thereof. A further embodiment is one wherein the solution of CEM-101 is above ambient temperature, for example about 65 to about 80° C. or about 65° C. A further embodiment is one wherein water at about ambient temperature is added to the solution. Another embodiment is one wherein water is added to the solution dropwise. In one embodiment of any of the above processes for the preparation of Form II of CEM-101 the volume:volume ratio of organic solvent to water is from about 1 to about 10. In another embodiment the prepared Form II of CEM-101 is substantially free of other physical forms.

The above processes may be carried out with or without using seeds of Form II of CEM-101.

For the above procedures, when a source of CEM-101 is a solid, it may be CEM-101 in amorphous form, as Form I or Form II, as a further crystalline form, as a glass, or as a mixture of any of those forms. It is to be understood that a solution of CEM-101 may also provide a source of CEM-101. As another embodiment, there is described a process of purifying CEM-101 comprising converting one or more forms or mixtures of forms of the CEM-101 into Form I or Form II substantially free of other physical forms. After such purification, it may be desired to convert CEM-101 into a different physical form for further use.

In another embodiment, described herein is a solid form of CEM-101 prepared by a process that includes the step of adding a solution of CEM-101 in a water miscible, polar organic solvent to water, such as at a temperature below 50° C. In addition, the process may include one or more of the following additional steps: optionally with heating, optionally filtering the solution, optionally reducing the volume of the resultant solution by evaporation, optionally with stirring, and collecting the resulting crystalline solid. In another embodiment, the water is at a temperature of about 10° C. to about 30° C. In another embodiment, the solvent is acetone, methanol or ethanol, or a combination thereof. In another embodiment, the organic solution is slowly added to water at about 20-30° C. In another embodiment, the volume:volume ratio of the organic solution to water is about 6 to about 15. In another embodiment, the volume:volume ratio of the organic solution to water is about 10 to about 13. In variations of the above, the process may include using seeds of Form I of CEM-101.

In another embodiment, described herein is a solid form of CEM-101 prepared by a process that includes the step of adding water to a solution of CEM-101 in a water miscible, polar organic solvent. In addition, the process may include one or more of the following additional steps: optionally filtering the solution, optionally reducing the volume of the resultant solution by evaporation, optionally with stirring, and collecting the resulting crystalline solid. In another embodiment, the water miscible, polar organic solvent is protic. In another embodiment, the water miscible, polar organic solvent is aprotic. A further embodiment is one wherein the water miscible, polar organic solvent is acetone, acetonitrile, 1,4-dioxane, methanol or ethanol, or a combination thereof. A further embodiment is one wherein the solution of the water miscible, polar organic solvent is above ambient temperature, for example about 65 to about 80° C. or about 65° C. A further embodiment is one wherein water at about ambient temperature is added to the solution. Another embodiment is one wherein water is added to the solution dropwise. In another embodiment, the volume:volume ratio of organic solvent to water is from about 1 to about 10. In variations of the above, the process may include using seeds of Form II of CEM-101.

As another embodiment, there is described a pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 in crystalline form as described in any of the descriptions herein and further comprising at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient.

Illustratively, compositions may include one or more carriers, diluents, and/or excipients. The compounds described herein, or compositions containing them, may be formulated in a therapeutically effective amount in any conventional dosage forms appropriate for the methods described herein, and include one or more carriers, diluents, and/or excipients therefor. Such formulation compositions may be administered by a wide variety of conventional routes for the methods described herein, and in a wide variety of dosage formats, utilizing known procedures. Capsules and tablets are embodiments commonly used for oral administration of antibiotics. See generally, Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy, (21^(st) ed., 2005), as well as an illustrative formulation composition in the Examples.

As another embodiment, there is described a method of treatment of a bacterial infection, a protozoal infection, or a disorder related to a bacterial infection or protozoal infection comprising the step of administering to a subject in need thereof a therapeutically effective amount of CEM-101 in crystalline form as described herein, or a pharmaceutical composition thereof further comprising at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient. Illustrative dosing schedules include the daily administration of a composition, in a single or divided format, comprising about 1,200 mg, about 1,000 mg, about 800 mg, about 400 mg, about 200 mg, or about 100 mg.

As another embodiment, there is described a use of CEM-101 in crystalline form as described herein for the treatment of a bacterial infection, a protozoal infection, or a disorder related to a bacterial infection or protozoal infection.

As another embodiment, there is described a use of CEM-101 in crystalline form as described herein for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of a bacterial infection, a protozoal infection, or a disorder related to a bacterial infection or protozoal infection.

As a further embodiment, method or use described above is one wherein the subject is a mammal, a fish, a bird or a reptile. As another embodiment, there is described a method or use wherein the subject is a mammal. As another embodiment, there is described a method or use wherein the subject is a human.

The term “therapeutically effective amount” as used herein, refers to that amount of active compound or pharmaceutical agent that elicits the biological or medicinal response in a tissue system, animal or human that is being sought by a researcher, veterinarian, medical doctor or other clinician, which includes alleviation of the symptoms of the disease or disorder being treated. In one aspect, the therapeutically effective amount is that which may treat or alleviate the disease or symptoms of the disease at a reasonable benefit/risk ratio applicable to any medical treatment. However, it is to be understood that the total daily usage of the compounds and compositions described herein may be decided by the attending physician within the scope of sound medical judgment. The specific therapeutically-effective dose level for any particular patient will depend upon a variety of factors, including the disorder being treated and the severity of the disorder; activity of the specific compound employed; the specific composition employed; the age, body weight, general health, gender and diet of the patient: the time of administration, route of administration, and rate of excretion of the specific compound employed; the duration of the treatment; drugs used in combination or coincidentally with the specific compound employed; and like factors well known to the researcher, veterinarian, medical doctor or other clinician of ordinary skill.

As shown in the interconversion of slurries experiment summarized below in the Examples in Table B, slurries of Forms I and II are prepared in 2-propanol (IPA) and 4-butanone (MEK) at ambient, sub-ambient, and elevated temperatures. In 2-propanol, conversion of Form I to Form II appears to be solubility driven at ambient and sub-ambient temperatures, with little apparent change observed in the ratio of Forms I and II by XRPD analysis over 3 days. Extending the interconversion period to 8 days at room temperature left only a trace of Form I remaining. In 2-propanol, at elevated temperature, only Form II is obtained. Experiments based on 2-butanone did not have the apparent solubility limitation and gave Form II as the only observed form at sub-ambient, ambient and elevated temperatures. Based on these experiments and the DSC results, but without being bound by theory, it appears that Form II may be more stable than Form I throughout the temperature range. In addition, but without being bound by theory, the DSC results suggest that Form I and II are monotropically related.

As shown below in the Examples in Table C-1, Form I exhibited greater aqueous solubility than Form II over a pH range from 9.2 to 1.2.

When the forms of CEM-101 are dosed in a vehicle in which the compound is well solubilized, there is no observed difference in measured pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, and AUC, among Form I and Form II. When the forms of CEM-101 are dosed in a vehicle in which the compound is present as a solid, there is no statistical difference in measured pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax, Tmax, and AUC, among Form I and Form II.

In another embodiment, crystalline forms of CEM-101, and mixtures thereof, are described herein that show improved solubility compared to amorphous forms of CEM-101

EXAMPLES X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD) Peak Positions

XRPD patterns were collected using an Inel XRG-3000 diffractometer equipped with a curved position sensitive detector with a 2θ range of 120°. An incident beam of Cu Kα radiation (40 kV, 30 mA) was used to collect data in real time at a resolution of 0.03° 2θ. Prior to the analysis, a silicon standard (NIST SRM 640c) was analyzed to verify the Si 111 peak position. Samples were prepared for analysis by packing them into thin-walled glass capillaries. Each capillary was mounted onto a goniometer head and rotated during data acquisition. The monochromator slit was set at 5 mm by 160 μm.

Alternatively, XRPD patterns were collected using a PANalytical X'Pert Pro diffractometer. An incident beam of Cu Kα radiation was produced using an Optix long, fine-focus source. An elliptically graded multilayer mirror was used to focus the Cu Kα X-rays of the source through the specimen and onto the detector. Data were collected and analyzed using X'Pert Pro Data Collector software (v. 2.2b). Prior to the analysis, a silicon specimen (NIST SRM 640c) was analyzed to verify the Si 111 peak position. The specimen was sandwiched between 3 μm thick films, analyzed in transmission geometry, and rotated to optimize orientation statistics. A beam-stop and a helium atmosphere were used to minimize the background generated by air scattering. Soller slits were used for the incident and diffracted beams to minimize axial divergence. Diffraction patterns were collected using a scanning position-sensitive detector (X'Celerator) located 240 mm from the specimen.

The data presented herein contain X-ray diffraction patterns and tables with peak lists. It is to be understood that the range of data collected may be instrument dependent. Under typical circumstances, peaks within the range of up to about 30 °2θ are selected. Although peaks may be labeled on diffraction patterns and listed in tables, it is to be understood that different rounding algorithms may be used to round each peak to the nearest 0.1 or 0.01 °2θ, depending upon the instrument used to collect the data and/or the inherent peak resolution. Should there be a difference, the peak positions listed in the tables should be used. The location of the peaks along the x-axis (°2θ) in both the figures and the tables may be automatically determined using appropriate software, which is typically resident on the instrument used and rounded to one or two significant figures after the decimal point based upon the above criteria. Peak position variabilities are given herein to within +0.1 °2θ based upon recommendations outlined in the USP discussion of variability in x-ray powder diffraction (United States Pharmacopeia, USP 32, NF 27, Vol. 1, pg. 392, 2009). The accuracy and precision associated with any particular measurement reported herein has not been determined. Measurements on independently prepared samples on different instruments may lead to variability which is greater than ±0.1 °2θ. For d-space listings, the wavelength used to calculate d-spacings was 1.541874 Å, a weighted average of the Cu-K_(α1) and Cu-K_(α2) wavelengths (Phys. Rev. A56(6) 4554-4568 (1997)). Variability associated with d-spacing estimates was calculated from the USP recommendation, at each d-spacing, and provided in the respective data tables.

When multiple diffraction patterns are available, then assessments of particle statistics (PS) and/or preferred orientation (PO) are possible. Reproducibility among XRPD patterns from multiple samples analyzed on a single diffractometer indicates that the particle statistics are adequate. Consistency of relative intensity among XRPD patterns from multiple diffractometers indicates good orientation statistics. Alternatively, the observed XRPD pattern may be compared with a calculated XRPD pattern based upon a single crystal structure, if available. Two-dimensional scattering patterns using area detectors can also be used to evaluate PS/PO. If the effects of both PS and PO are determined to be negligible, then the XRPD pattern is representative of the powder average intensity for the sample and prominent peaks may be identified as “Representative Peaks”. In general, it is appreciated that the more data collected to determine Representative Peaks, the more statistically significant is the classification of those peaks.

CEM-101 Form I.

One PANalytical pattern and one Inel pattern were analyzed for this material, and therefore at least partially optimized orientation and particle statistic effects could be assessed through comparison with multiple patterns. The peak positions and intensities are consistent between patterns, indicating adequate particle and orientation statistics. Observed Peaks are shown in FIG. 1 and Table 1, and Representative Peaks are listed in Table 2.

TABLE 1 Observed peaks for CEM-101 Form I. °2θ d-space (Å) Intensity (%)  6.19 ± 0.10 14.268 ± 0.234  13  8.47 ± 0.10 10.443 ± 0.125  30  8.80 ± 0.10 10.047 ± 0.115  68  9.34 ± 0.10 9.473 ± 0.102 10 10.52 ± 0.10 8.407 ± 0.080 100 10.97 ± 0.10 8.062 ± 0.074 46 12.04 ± 0.10 7.349 ± 0.061 25 12.41 ± 0.10 7.132 ± 0.058 43 13.20 ± 0.10 6.709 ± 0.051 88 13.68 ± 0.10 6.472 ± 0.047 41 14.52 ± 0.10 6.102 ± 0.042 22 14.85 ± 0.10 5.965 ± 0.040 22 17.02 ± 0.10 5.209 ± 0.031 45 18.03 ± 0.10 4.921 ± 0.027 46 18.61 ± 0.10 4.768 ± 0.026 71 19.48 ± 0.10 4.557 ± 0.023 48 19.73 ± 0.10 4.500 ± 0.023 56 20.68 ± 0.10 4.294 ± 0.021 38 21.17 ± 0.10 4.197 ± 0.020 39 21.89 ± 0.10 4.061 ± 0.018 53 23.41 ± 0.10 3.801 ± 0.016 25 24.44 ± 0.10 3.642 ± 0.015 11 24.91 ± 0.10 3.574 ± 0.014 37 25.61 ± 0.10 3.478 ± 0.013 18 26.35 ± 0.10 3.383 ± 0.013 11 26.80 ± 0.10 3.327 ± 0.012 24 29.04 ± 0.10 3.075 ± 0.010 18 29.96 ± 0.10 2.983 ± 0.010 10

TABLE 2 Representative peaks for CEM-101 Form I. °2θ d-space (Å) Intensity (%)  8.80 ± 0.10 10.047 ± 0.115  68 10.52 ± 0.10 8.407 ± 0.080 100 13.20 ± 0.10 6.709 ± 0.051 88 18.61 ± 0.10 4.768 ± 0.026 71

CEM-101 Form II.

One Inel pattern was analyzed for this material, and preferred orientation and particle statistic effects could be assessed through comparison with the simulated pattern from single crystal data (not shown). The peak positions and intensities are consistent between patterns, indicating adequate particle and orientation statistics. Observed peaks are shown in FIG. 2 and Table 3, and representative peaks are listed in Table 4.

TABLE 3 Observed peaks for CEM-101 Form II. °2θ d-space (Å) Intensity (%)  5.60 ± 0.10 15.772 ± 0.286  53  7.85 ± 0.10 11.260 ± 0.145  54  9.30 ± 0.10 9.505 ± 0.103 69  9.82 ± 0.10 9.004 ± 0.092 36 10.65 ± 0.10 8.304 ± 0.078 36 11.24 ± 0.10 7.871 ± 0.070 45 11.66 ± 0.10 7.592 ± 0.065 75 11.97 ± 0.10 7.395 ± 0.062 38 12.87 ± 0.10 6.880 ± 0.054 100 13.28 ± 0.10 6.666 ± 0.050 33 13.77 ± 0.10 6.432 ± 0.047 32 14.15 ± 0.10 6.260 ± 0.044 36 14.63 ± 0.10 6.054 ± 0.041 35 15.12 ± 0.10 5.861 ± 0.039 48 16.71 ± 0.10 5.306 ± 0.032 78 17.23 ± 0.10 5.147 ± 0.030 33 17.50 ± 0.10 5.067 ± 0.029 36 18.37 ± 0.10 4.830 ± 0.026 38 18.58 ± 0.10 4.776 ± 0.026 43 18.78 ± 0.10 4.724 ± 0.025 40 19.34 ± 0.10 4.590 ± 0.024 37 19.68 ± 0.10 4.510 ± 0.023 46 20.62 ± 0.10 4.308 ± 0.021 38 20.97 ± 0.10 4.237 ± 0.020 43 21.17 ± 0.10 4.196 ± 0.020 47 21.38 ± 0.10 4.156 ± 0.019 35 21.83 ± 0.10 4.071 ± 0.019 34 22.11 ± 0.10 4.021 ± 0.018 34 22.59 ± 0.10 3.936 ± 0.017 27 23.32 ± 0.10 3.815 ± 0.016 32 23.49 ± 0.10 3.787 ± 0.016 32 24.15 ± 0.10 3.685 ± 0.015 28 24.43 ± 0.10 3.644 ± 0.015 32 24.77 ± 0.10 3.594 ± 0.014 30 25.61 ± 0.10 3.479 ± 0.013 30 25.78 ± 0.10 3.456 ± 0.013 29 26.23 ± 0.10 3.398 ± 0.013 27 26.58 ± 0.10 3.354 ± 0.012 25 27.23 ± 0.10 3.275 ± 0.012 26 27.55 ± 0.10 3.238 ± 0.012 26 27.86 ± 0.10 3.203 ± 0.011 31 28.52 ± 0.10 3.130 ± 0.011 24 29.49 ± 0.10 3.029 ± 0.010 26

TABLE 4 Representative peaks for CEM-101 Form II. °2θ d-space (Å) Intensity (%)  5.60 ± 0.10 15.772 ± 0.286  53  7.85 ± 0.10 11.260 ± 0.145  54  9.30 ± 0.10 9.505 ± 0.103 69 11.66 ± 0.10 7.592 ± 0.065 75 12.87 ± 0.10 6.880 ± 0.054 100 16.71 ± 0.10 5.306 ± 0.032 78

Recrystallization Studies

Recrystallization conditions that yield Form I and Form II, as well as conditions which afford amorphous material or mixtures of Form I and Form II, as well as the outputs (recoveries) from the conditions are shown in the following Table A. Recrystallization Studies. The polymorph form was determined by analysis of the X-ray powder diffraction pattern for each isolated product. In the table, “T” represents the ratio of solvent to the mass of solid in mL/mg (or L/g); DCM means dichloromethane; DMF means dimethylformamide; and IPE means isopropylether.

TABLE A Recrystallization Study Results CEM-101 CEM-101 Polymorph Experiment Input Solvent Procedure Output Form 1 5 g Acetone Water (10T) Dissolved solid in acetone 4.5 g Form II (5T) and added water dropwise at 30° C. 2 5 g DCM (5T) Dissolved in DCM and 4.4 g Amorphous freeze dried 3 5 g Acetone Water (50T) Dissolved solid in acetone 4.4 g Form I + (5T) and added to water Form II dropwise at 30° C. 4 2 g DMF(2T) Water (50T) Dissolved solid in DMF 1.8 g Form I and added to water dropwise at 28° C. 5 3 g Methanol Water (18T) Dissolved solid in methanol 2.5 g Form II (18T) and added water dropwise at 28° C. 6 3 g Ethanol Water (10T) Dissolved solid in ethanol 2.2 g Form II (10T) and added water dropwise at 28° C. 7 3 g Methanol (18T) Dissolved in methanol and 2.7 g Form II + freeze dried Form I 8 3 g DCM (3T) Cyclohexane Dissolved solid in DCM 2.3 g Form II (20T) and added to cyclohexane in one portion at 28° C. 9 3 g Ethanol IPE (33T) Dissolved solid in ethanol 1.2 g Form II (10T) and added to IPE in one portion at 28° C. 10 2 g Acetonitrile (4T) Dissolved solid in 0.6 g Form I + acetonitrile and cooled to Form II 30° C. 11 2 g 1,4-Dioxane Water (5T) Dissolved solid in 1,4- 2.1 Form II (5T) Dioxane at 70° C. and added water at 0° C. to 5° C. 12 2 g Acetonitrile Water (4T) Dissolved solid in 1.6 g Form II (4T) acetonitrile at 80° C. and added water at 55° C. 13 1 g Acetonitrile (4T) Dissolved solid in 0.5 g Form II + acetonitrile at 80° C. and Form I seeded with 10 mg of Form I 14 1 g Acetonitrile (4T) Dissolved solid in 0.4 g Form II acetonitrile at 80° C. and seeded with 100 mg of Form I 15 12 g  DCM (3T) Dissolved in DCM and 9.3 g Amorphous freeze dried 16 1 g Ethanol Water (5T) Dissolved solid (Form I) 0.8 g Form II (15T) in ethanol (15 mL) in 65° C., reduced volume to 5 mL and added water (5 mL) dropwise at 28° C. 17 2 g DMF(2T) Water (50T) Dissolved solid (Form II) 1.9 g Form I + in DMF (4 mL) and added Form II to water (100 mL) dropwise at 28° C. 18 5 g Acetone Water (50T) Dissolved solid (Form II) 4.9 g Form I (7T) in acetone (35 mL) in 65° C., reduced volume to 20 mL and added to water (100 mL) dropwise at 28° C. The wet solid was suspended in water and stirred under heating at 65° C., cooled and filtered. 19 2 g Water Dissolved solid (Form II) 1.8 g Form II in water (100 mL) and stirred under heating at 60° C., cooled and filtered. 20 5 g Ethanol Water (5T) Dissolved solid (Form II) 4.8 g Unknown (15T) in ethanol (75 mL) at 65° C., reduced volume to 35 mL and added water dropwise at 60° C. Ethanol was removed by distillation after formation of the solid, stirring under heating, cooled and filtered. 21 5 g Acetone Water (60T) Dissolved solid (Form I + 4.5 g Form I (6T) II) in acetone (30 mL) at 65° C., filtered, reduced volume to 20 mL and added to water (300 mL) dropwise at 27° C., stirred and filtered. 22 5 g Acetone Water (60T) Dissolved solid (Form I + 4.5 g Form I (8T) II) in acetone (40 mL) at 65° C., filtered, reduced volume to 30 mL and added to water (450 mL) dropwise at 27° C., stirred and filtered. 23 2 g Ethanol Water (60T) Dissolved solid (Form I + 1.7 g Form I (15T) II) in ethanol (30 mL) at 65° C., filtered, reduced volume to 16 mL and added to water (120 mL) dropwise at 27° C., stirred and filtered. 24 5 g Acetone Water (60T) Dissolved solid (Form I + 4.4 g Form II (6T) II) in acetone (30 mL) at 65° C., filtered, reduced volume to 20 mL and water (300 mL) was added dropwise at 27° C., stirred and filtered. 25 5 g Acetone Water (50T) Dissolved solid (Form I + 4.5 g Form I + (7T) II) in acetone (35 mL) at little of 65° C., filtered, reduced Form II volume to 25 mL and added to water (250 mL) dropwise at 27° C., stirred and filtered. 26 5 g Ethanol Water (50T) Dissolved solid (Form I + 4.4 g Form I (15T) II) in ethanol (75 mL) at 65° C., filtered, reduced volume to 40 mL and added to water (250 mL) dropwise at 27° C., stirred and filtered.

Hot Stage Microscopy and DSC

Form I of CEM-101 exhibits a melt onset at about 180° C. and final melt at about 200° C. by hot stage microscopy and exhibits endothermic events at 170 and 197-198° C. by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Form II of CEM-101 exhibits a melt onset at about 215° C. by hot stage microscopy and a DSC peak at about 225° C., as a single endothermic event. Mixtures of varying amounts of Form I and Form II have exhibited endothermic events at 194-199 and at 219-225° C. by DSC, depending upon the ratio of the forms. It is to be understood that hot stage microscopy and/or DSC may be used to determine the presence or absence of certain forms in the compounds and compositions described herein.

Interconversion Studies.

Interconversion studies by slurrying of Form I and Form II are shown in the following Table B in which the starting solid was a mixture of Form I and Form II; IPA is isopropyl alcohol (isopropanol) and MEK is methyl ethyl ketone (2-butanone).

TABLE B Interconversion Slurries for CEM-101 Form A and B Solids XRPD Solvent Conditions^(a) Result^(b) IPA 60° C. 3 days Form II RT 3 days Form I + II RT 5 days^(c) (8 days total) Form II + trace Form I 2-8° C. 3 days Form I + II 2-8° C. 5 days^(d) Form I + II (8 days total) MEK 60° C. 3 days IS^(b) 60° C. 3 days^(c) (6 days total) Form II RT 3 days Form II 2-8° C. 3 days Form II ^(a)Reported times and temperatures are approximate. RT = ambient temperature. ^(b)XRPD = X-ray powder diffraction, IS = insufficient solids for analysis. ^(c)Continuation of previous slurry with additional solids. ^(d)Continuation of previous slurry.

Aqueous Solubility.

Using a linear calibration curve obtained by plotting the concentration of CEM-101 vs. LC/MS-MS peak areas, the aqueous solubility of forms of CEM-101 are obtained as follows: Test compounds (dry powder) are added to 0.9% saline (initial pH 6.03) until precipitation, and the mixture is incubated for 6 h with shaking. After the incubation period, the samples are centrifuged twice and solubility is estimated using the linearity standard curve for the compound: Form I showed a solubility of 1411 μg/mL.

Using a linear calibration curve obtained by plotting the concentration of CEM-101 vs. LC/MS-MS peak areas, the aqueous solubility of forms of CEM-101 was obtained as follows: Test compounds (dry powder) were added to water with the indicated pH until precipitation, and the mixture was incubated for 6 h with shaking. After the incubation period, the samples were centrifuged twice and solubility was estimated using the linearity standard curve for the compound: Media: Water at pH: pH 9.2, 7.4, 4 and 1.2 (adjusted using 0.1N NaOH and 0.1 N HCl); Incubation: 6 h at 26° C. with shaking; Test concentrations: Dry powder added till saturation; Detection: LC/MS-MS. The results are shown in Table C-1.

TABLE C-1 Aqueous Solubility Study Form II Form I pH (μg/mL) (μg/mL) 9.2 331 1751 7.4 305 2224 4 361 4656 1.2 3638 4808

Intrinsic Dissolution Comparison.

Mean intrinsic dissolution rates for exemplary batches of the two forms are shown in Table cC-2 for 3 batches of Form I (SD and % CV for one batch shown) and for Form II.

TABLE C-2 Mean Intrinsic Dissolution Studies. Mean intrinsic dissolution rate (mg/min/cm²) Form I Form II Dissolution Medium Batch A Batch B Batch C SD* % CV* SD % CV 0.1N Hydrochloric Acid 9.4 10.6 7.9 35.8 9.8 8.8 38.0 9.4 Acetate buffer, pH 4.5 2.1 2.8 2.7 6.43 5.2 2.7 6.4 10.3 Phosphate buffer, pH 6.8 0.004 0.03 0.02 0.53 53.0 0.01 0.5 51.1 Phosphate buffer, pH 7.6 0.02 0.001 ND NA NA ND NA NA Water 2.0 0.7 1.6 4.91 9.6 ND NA NA *SD and CV % for Batch C only. ND, not determined. NA, not applicable.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of CEM-101 in Balb/c Mice.

The pharmacokinetics of lots of CEM-101 characterized as Form I and Form II were evaluated in Balb/c mice receiving a singe dose of 20 or 100 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) via oral gavage. The doses were prepared as 2.0 mg/mL or 10.0 mg/mL in a vehicle of 0.5% (w/v) carboxymethyl cellulose in water and a dose volume of 10 mL/kg b.w. Blood samples were collected at various time points during the next 6 h post dose. The results are shown as follows:

TABLE D Plasma concentrations of CEM-101 in μg/mL vs. time in female Balb/c mouse at 20 mg/kg b.w. Table D. CEM-101 Form I and Form II Polymorphs Oral pharmacokinetics studies in female Balb/c mouse (20 mg/kg b.w.) Plasma concentrations (μg/mL); Female Balb/c mouse (20 mg/kg b.w.) CEM-101Form II CEM-101 Form I Time (h) Mean Stdv Mean Stdv 0.00 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.25 6.2 ± 1.6 8.2 ± 2.4 0.50 8.8 ± 0.8 13.6 ± 2.0  1.00 7.3 ± 0.9 12.0 ± 1.7  2.00 6.1 ± 1.0 11.3 ± 1.4  4.00 5.5 ± 1.7 7.7 ± 0.7 6.00 1.3 ± 0.5 4.2 ± 0.4

TABLE E Plasma concentrations of CEM-101 in μg/mL vs. time in male Balb/c mouse at 20 mg/kg b.w. Table E. CEM-101 Form I and Form II Polymorphs Oral pharmacokinetics studies in male Balb/c mouse (20 mg/kg b.w.) Plasma concentrations (μg/mL); Male Balb/c mouse (20 mg/kg b.w.) CEM-101 Form II CEM-101 Form I Time (h) Mean Stdv Mean Stdv 0.00 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.25 4.1 ± 0.8 5.3 ± 1.8 0.50 6.7 ± 0.6 7.7 ± 1.6 1.00 5.9 ± 0.8 9.5 ± 0.9 2.00 5.6 ± 0.4 6.4 ± 0.8 4.00 4.9 ± 1.1 5.9 ± 0.6 6.00 2.9 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 0.8

TABLE F Plasma concentrations of CEM-101 in μg/mL vs. time in female Balb/c mouse at 100 mg/kg b.w. Table F. CEM-101 Form I and Form II Polymorphs Oral pharmacokinetics studies in female Balb/c mouse (100 mg/kg b.w.) Plasma concentrations (μg/mL); Female Balb/c mouse (100 mg/kg b.w.) CEM-101 Form II CEM-101 Form I Time (h) Mean Stdv Mean Stdv 0.00 0.0 ± 0.0  0.0 ± 0.0 0.25 7.3 ± 0.9 11.9 ± 1.7 0.50 10.5 ± 1.4  11.6 ± 1.6 1.00 9.6 ± 2.2 14.7 ± 2.3 2.00 9.5 ± 2.2 14.1 ± 2.9 4.00 10.2 ± 1.0  16.0 ± 2.3 6.00 7.8 ± 1.1 19.5 ± 2.3

TABLE G Plasma concentrations of CEM-101 in μg/mL vs. time in male Balb/c mouse at 100 mg/kg b.w. Table G. CEM-101 Form I and Form II Polymorphs Oral pharmacokinetics studies in female Balb/c mouse (100 mg/kg b.w.) Plasma concentrations (μg/mL); Male Balb/c mouse (100 mg/kg b.w.) CEM-101 Form II CEM-101 Form I Time (h) Mean Stdv Mean Stdv 0.00 0.0 ± 0.0  0.0 ± 0.0 0.25 6.8 ± 0.7 11.3 ± 2.5 0.50 6.9 ± 1.1 10.7 ± 3.0 1.00 8.7 ± 2.7 13.1 ± 3.2 2.00 9.3 ± 1.2 13.4 ± 3.1 4.00 10.6 ± 1.4  17.4 ± 2.9 6.00 7.2 ± 0.8 12.0 ± 2.0

TABLE H Mean Plasma PK Parameters at 20 mg/kg. Table H. CEM-101 Form I and Form II Polymorphs Oral pharmacokinetics studies in Balb/c mouse Mean Plasma PK Parameters Male - 20 mg/kg Female - 20 mg/kg CEM-101 CEM-101 CEM-101 CEM-101 Parameters Form II Form I Form II Form I Route of Oral Oral Oral Oral administration Dose (mg/kg) 20 20 20 20 Cmax (μg/mL) 6.73 9.5 8.8 13.6 Tmax (h) 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 AUClast (h * μg/mL) 29 35 31.6 53 (0 to 6 h) AUCinf (h * μg/mL) 49 46 36 70 AUCextrap (%) 42 24 12 24

TABLE I Mean Plasma PK Parameters at 100 mg/kg. Table I. CEM-101 Form I and Form II Polymorphs Oral pharmacokinetics studies in Balb/c mouse Mean Plasma PK Parameters Male - 100 mg/kg Female - 100 mg/kg CEM-101 CEM-101 CEM-101 CEM-101 Parameters Form II Form I Form II Form I Route of administration Oral Oral Oral Oral Dose (mg/kg) 100 100 100 100 Cmax (μg/mL) 10.6 17.4 10.5 19.5 Tmax (h) 4 4 4 6 AUClast (h * μg/mL) (0 66 83.5 55 91 to 6 h) AUCinf (h * μg/mL) 99 NC NC NC AUCextrap (%) 33 NC NC NC

Pharmacokinetic (PK) Comparison.

Results of a further oral pharmacokinetic study of Form I and Form II in groups of 5 female Balb/c mice receiving a singe dose at 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg is are shown in Table J.

TABLE J Mean Plasma PK Parameters Dosing 5 mg/kg 10 mg/kg 20 mg/kg AUC AUC AUC Form c t½ Tmax Cmax 0-24 t½ Tmax Cmax 0-24 t½ Tmax Cmax 0-24 I N 1 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 Mean 1.32 0.600 1.43 3.30 3.60 2.40 4.68 17.7 2.10 1.60 6.64 26.2 SD NC 0.224 0.249 0.551 1.65 0.894 1.31 3.25 0.509 0.548 1.84 4.84 Min 1.32 0.500 1.02 2.78 2.44 2.00 3.21 14.4 1.73 1.00 4.66 19.5 Median 1.32 0.500 1.54 3.16 2.95 2.00 4.09 17.2 1.91 2.00 5.91 26.7 Max 1.32 1.00 1.65 4.24 6.05 4.00 6.11 21.1 2.85 2.00 9.34 33.0 CV % NC 37.3 17.4 16.7 46.0 37.3 27.9 18.3 24.2 34.2 27.7 18.5 II N 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 2 5 5 5 Mean 1.17 1.20 1.85 4.69 1.42 1.25 2.63 7.58 2.46 1.10 5.36 20.1 SD 0.297 0.447 0.249 0.819 0.263 0.750 1.22 2.27 0.0517 0.548 0.837 3.33 Min 0.935 1.00 1.55 4.21 1.12 0.250 1.50 4.62 2.43 0.500 3.88 16.3 Median 1.12 1.00 1.80 4.31 1.53 1.00 2.42 7.59 2.46 1.00 5.66 21.7 Max 1.67 2.00 2.12 6.14 1.61 2.00 4.69 10.0 2.50 2.00 5.96 23.4 CV % 25.3 37.3 13.5 17.5 18.5 60.0 46.3 30.0 2.10 49.8 15.6 16.6

Examples of Pharmaceutical Compositions Using CEM-101 Form I.

The following formulation is used to provide Size 0 hard gelatin capsules containing 200 mg of CEM-101 per capsule.

Material % w/w Qty/Cap (mg) CEM-101 61.54 200.00 Avicel PH101 30.96 100.63 Plasdone K29/32 2.00 6.50 Ac-Di-Sol 4.00 13.00 Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, NF 1.00 3.25 Magnesium Stearate, NF 0.50 1.63 (Vegetable Grade) Purified Water,* USP 64.3 — Total 100.00 325.00 *Estimated amount of purified water. Removed during processing; not in final formula.

The following formulation is used to provide tablets containing 200 mg per tablet, containing 54% drug load and a target weight of 370 mg/tablet. The drug product is manufactured by wet granulation and the tablets are compressed at 6 kp.

Material % w/w Qty/Tablet (mg) CEM-101* (Intra-granular) 54.04 200.00 Avicel PH101 (Intra-granular) 18.00 66.60 Sodium Lauryl Sulfate 1.00 3.70 (Intra-granular) Plasdone K29/32 (Intra-solution) 3.00 11.10 Pearlitol 200SD (Extra-granular) 17.95 66.40 Ac-Di-Sol (Extra-granular) 5.00 18.50 Cab-O-Sil (Extra-granular) 0.50 1.85 Magnesium Stearate (Vegetable 0.50 1.85 Grade) (Extra-granular) Purified Water** Total: 100.00 370.00 *Adusted for potency **Removed during processing, not in final formulation.

Example

The stability of Form I and Form II of CEM-101 was evaluated under various conditions, as shown in the following Tables. In each case, there was no observed change in color of the test material during the entire study. In each case, the test material was first placed in Primary Packaging Material (LLDPE bag within a HMHDPE/LDPE/LDPE blend bag, and then heat sealed). The Primary Packaging Material was placed in Secondary Packaging Material (HDPE drum). All other impurities were less than 1% at each time point.

Form II, 2-8° C. 9 12 Initial 3 Month 6 Month Month Month Water 1.01% 1.24% 1.39% 1.38% 1.37% Chromatographic 97.0 96.0 96.8 96.4 96.8 Purity 3-Ethynylaniline Not Not Not 0.01% 0.12% Detected Detected Detected Assay 93.9 93.4 93.6 93.3 93.0 (on hydrous basis)

Form II, 25° C./60% RH 9 12 Initial 3 Month 6 Month Month Month Water 1.01% 1.16% 1.42% 1.45% 1.48% Chromatographic 97.0% 96.0% 96.7% 96.2% 96.1% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline Not Not Not 0.04% 0.11% Detected Detected Detected Assay 93.9% 93.6% 93.7% 93.2% 93.0% (on hydrous basis)

Form II, 40° C./75% RH 9 12 Initial 3 Month 6 Month Month Month Water 1.01% 1.24% 1.62% 1.51% 1.56% Chromatographic 97.0% 95.9% 96.5% 96.2% 97.1% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline Not Not Not 0.02% 0.05% Detected Detected Detected Assay 93.9% 93.0% 93.1% 92.5% 92.3% (on hydrous basis)

Form I (Lot 3), 2-8° C. Initial 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month Water 1.11% 1.63% 1.61% 1.69% Chromatographic 98.3% 98.1% 98.4% 98.5% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline 0.01% 0.01% Not Detected Not Detected Assay 99.5% 98.9% 98.8% 98.7% (on hydrous basis)

Form I (Lot 3), 25° C./60% RH Initial 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month Water 1.11% 1.65% 1.71% 1.75% Chromatographic 98.3% 98.1% 98.3% 98.4% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline 0.01% 0.01% Not Detected Not Detected Assay 99.5% 98.7% 98.6% 98.5% (on hydrous basis)

Form I (Lot 3), 40° C./75% RH Initial 3 Month 12 Month Water 1.11% 1.68% 1.84% Chromatographic 98.3% 98.0% 98.3% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Assay 99.5% 98.5% 98.3% (on hydrous basis)

Form I (Lot 4), 2-8° C. Initial 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month Water 0.92% 1.56% 1.47% 1.51% Chromatographic 98.2% 98.1% 98.3% 98.4% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Not Detected Assay 99.0% 98.4% 98.3% 98.2% (on hydrous basis)

Form I (Lot 4), 25° C./60% RH Initial 3 Month 6 Month 12 Month Water 0.92% 1.59% 1.75% 1.78% Chromatographic 98.2% 98.1% 98.4% 98.4% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline 0.01% 0.01% Not Detected Not Detected Assay 99.0% 98.3% 98.2% 98.1% (on hydrous basis)

Form I (Lot 4), 40° C./75% RH Initial 3 Month 12 Month Water 0.92% 1.65% 1.82% Chromatographic 98.2% 98.4% 98.3% Purity 3-Ethynylaniline 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% Assay 99.0% 98.2% 98.1% (on hydrous basis) 

What is claimed is:
 1. The compound CEM-101 in crystalline form.
 2. The form of claim 1 which is Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including at least three peaks at approximate positions selected from the group consisting of about °2θ=6.2, 8.5, 8.8, 10.5, 13.2, and 18.6.
 3. The form of claim 1 which is Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including at least three peaks at approximate positions selected from the group consisting of about °2θ=8.8, 10.5, 13.2, and 18.6.
 4. The form of claim 1 which is Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=6.2 and 8.8.
 5. The form of claim 1 which is Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=8.5 and 8.8.
 6. The form of claim 1 which is Form I of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=6.2, 8.5, and 8.8.
 7. CEM-101, comprising Form I of CEM-101 according to claim 2 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including at least three peaks at approximate positions selected from the group consisting of about °2θ=8.5, 8.8, 10.5, 13.2, and 18.6.
 8. CEM-101 according to claim 7 that is substantially free of Form II.
 9. CEM-101 according to claim 7 as determined by the X-ray powder diffraction pattern, wherein one or more peaks at °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.8, or 11.7 are absent or nearly absent.
 10. CEM-101 according to claim 7 as determined by the X-ray powder diffraction pattern, wherein one or more peaks at °2θ=5.6 or 7.9 are absent or nearly absent.
 11. The form of claim 1 which is Form II of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with at least three peaks at approximate positions selected from the group consisting of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.3, 9.8, 11.7, 12.9, and 16.7.
 12. The form of claim 1 which is Form II of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with at least three peaks at approximate positions selected from the group consisting of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.8, 11.7, 12.9, and 16.7.
 13. The form of claim 1 which is Form II of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6 and 7.9.
 14. The form of claim 1 which is Form II of CEM-101 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern including peaks at approximate positions of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, and 9.8.
 15. CEM-101, comprising Form II of CEM-101 according to claim 11 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with at least three peaks at approximate positions selected from the group consisting of about °2θ=5.6, 7.9, 9.8, 11.7, 12.9 and 16.7.
 16. CEM-101 according to claim 15 that is substantially free of Form I.
 17. CEM-101 according to claim 15 as determined by the X-ray powder diffraction pattern, wherein one or more peaks at about °2θ=8.5 or 8.8 are absent or nearly absent.
 18. The form of claim 1 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern substantially the same as that of FIG.
 1. 19. The form of claim 1 having an X-ray powder diffraction pattern substantially the same as that of FIG.
 2. 20. A pharmaceutical composition comprising CEM-101 in crystalline form according to claim 1 and further comprising at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent, or excipient, or a combination thereof.
 21. A method of treatment of a bacterial infection, a protozoal infection, or a disorder related to a bacterial infection or protozoal infection in a host animal, the method comprising the step of administering to the host animal a therapeutically effective amount of CEM-101 in crystalline form according to claim 1, or a pharmaceutical composition thereof further comprising at least one pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent, or excipient, or a combination thereof.
 22. The method of claim 21 wherein the host animal is a mammal, a fish, a bird or a reptile.
 23. The method of claim 21 wherein the host animal is a human. 